In this article 01. Non-compliance is more expensive than compliance 02. High false positive rates and expensive onshore resources 03. Voice surveillance emerges as a critical area for improvement 04. Bridging the gap to voice 05. Missed opportunities 06. Ready to manage risk and unlock more value from your communications data? Speak to our team Managing risk, ensuring compliance and improving oversight are increasingly challenging tasks. It comes as no surprise that the 2024 1LoD Surveillance Benchmarking Report reveals a significant trend: 74% of banks plan to invest in new voice surveillance technology before 2027. But why is it the next strategic investment for so many financial institutions? Non-compliance is more expensive than compliance Where banks might have aimed to invest as little as they could get away with in the past, this position may well need to change moving forward if the latest fine at JP Morgan is anything to go by – a staggering $348 million for trade monitoring lapses underscores the seriousness of regulatory oversight. And whilst historically major fines have been targeted at Tier 1 banks, regulators are directing scrutiny to smaller institutions, deemed influential in specific assets or markets. Consequently, avoiding investment in surveillance technology is no longer feasible for the ‘smaller players’, as regulators believe it is readily available to all. A comprehensive system of record should be accessible to all financial institutions, whether a Tier 1 bank or a boutique investment firm. Advanced technology can offer a unified platform for seamless record-keeping across various communication channels. Enriching meta data, bridging gaps, and providing flexibility in transcription engine selection, without necessitating a full-scale enterprise surveillance solution. High false positive rates and expensive onshore resources Increased coverage is a recognised on-going burden thanks to an ever-growing number of venues, calling for more efficient voice surveillance technology. As the 1LoD report highlights, surveillance subject matter experts (SMEs) are typically located in expensive regions, so it’s even more important that banks invest in efficient technology to optimise resource allocation. With respondents reporting an overwhelming number of false positives – as much as 98% – very expensive resource is being spent merely performing alert reviews, of the wrong kind. 90% of respondents agreed that AI can help reduce false positives. Solutions such as Wordwatch are a central system of record for all forms of live and legacy voice, chat and IM data. Enriching meta data through accurate transcription, translation, biometric identification and AI, built specifically for the trading domain. This helps significantly reduce false positives, allowing experts to focus on critical events, thereby maximising value. Voice surveillance emerges as a critical area for improvement The 1LoD report reveals dissatisfaction among respondents with current voice surveillance practices, highlighting just 25% of respondents were satisfied and 45% of respondents only partially satisfied. As voice monitoring poses unique challenges, selecting the right technology is paramount. Many banks still rely largely on outdated voice technology, characterised by cumbersome lexicons – in some cases over 1,000 – which is an expensive and inefficient approach. Banks can no longer hide behind these legacy systems to excuse poor surveillance – regulators are privy to the level of AI powered transcription technologies capable of meeting the demands of the modern trading environment. By embracing advanced solutions, banks can achieve unprecedented accuracy levels and bolster compliance efforts. Wordwatch offers comprehensive support for compliance and surveillance teams, whether transcribing or translating 5 or 25 languages. Wordwatch delivers a powerful system of record, clarity of data, legal hold and retention management on an aggregated global per user basis. This centralised data management and enrichment approach enables more thorough monitoring of market abuse, conduct, and culture. Bridging the gap to voice Interestingly, the 1LoD report observed that while banks actively develop trade and communication surveillance, external support is often sought for voice surveillance. By leveraging a centralised portal to consolidate voice data, enriching it with high-quality transcripts, and efficiently deliver it to downstream applications, banks can bridge the gap between their current surveillance capabilities and voice. This connection effectively integrates voice into their existing communication surveillance tools. Missed opportunities Despite advancements, many banks overlook the potential of surveillance data to drive proactive decision-making. Only 14% of banks utilise surveillance capabilities to identify commercial opportunities within client, market, and trading data. Using the right technology, financial institutions can unlock intelligence hidden within their communications data. Matching this to deal tickets and enabling the monitoring of trends and gaining powerful insight delivered by building out large language models unique to their business. As regulatory demands escalate, banks of all sizes must prioritise compliance. Ready to manage risk and unlock more value from your communications data? Speak to our team Written by: Business Systems UK
Blog 22 July, 2026 The Cost of Attrition: Why Workforce Engagement Management is a Self-Funding Strategy Contact centre attrition remains one of the most expensive challenges facing customer support leaders. CX Today reports annual turnover rates of 35-45% remain common across the industry, with each departure costing between £10,000 and £15,000 in recruitment, onboarding and lost productivity. For a 200-seat operation, that equates to roughly £700,000-£1.35 million in annual attrition costs
Blog 30 April, 2026 Customer Experience Tools: How to Choose (and Implement) the Right CX Platform for Your Business Choosing the right customer experience platform is a major decision for many businesses. The platform you choose shapes how customers interact with your business across every channel, determines what insights you can extract from those customer interactions, and influences whether or not your teams can deliver consistently excellent service. Yet many organisations approach this decision
Blog 16 April, 2026 Conversational AI in UK Contact Centres: Moving Beyond Basic Chatbots Many contact centres in the UK have implemented chatbot technology in some form or another, but with varying degrees of success. Recent industry research reveals that nearly 70% of customers become frustrated with chatbots and prefer speaking to human agents, and abandonment rates for basic chatbot interactions continue to remain stubbornly high. The problem isn’t
Blog 10 April, 2026 Proactive Customer Service: How Contact Centres Can Use Proactive AI to Anticipate Customer Needs The traditional model of customer service is almost entirely reactive: a customer discovers a problem, contacts your organisation, and waits for a solution. This approach places the burden squarely on the customer, requiring them to identify issues, navigate your contact channels, and often endure multiple interactions before their problem is solved. Proactive customer service powered
Blog 29 January, 2026 Microsoft Teams Recording Without the Risk: A Practical Guide for Regulated Organisations Microsoft Teams has become the backbone of collaboration across financial services, insurance, the public sector and other regulated industries. Trading conversations, client discussions, internal decisions and approvals are now happening daily across voice, video, chat and shared files. That shift brings opportunity, but it also introduces risk. For organisations operating under regulations such as FCA,
Blog 5 December, 2025 The clock is ticking: Why end-of-life recording systems are a critical compliance risk Outdated recording technology isn’t just an inconvenience, it’s a ticking time bomb for regulated firms. For financial services and other heavily regulated industries, end-of-life (EoL) voice recording systems can create dangerous blind spots. When vendors withdraw support, these unsupported platforms become vulnerable, exposing your firm to major compliance penalties under frameworks like MiFID II, FCA,
Blog 20 November, 2025 Proactive AI vs Reactive AI: Understanding the Difference Artificial intelligence is changing the way organisations across the UK engage with customers, but all AI solutions aren’t created equal. Many still rely on reactive models that respond only once a customer makes contact. Proactive AI takes a more advanced approach, identifying needs and acting before the customer does. Understanding the key differences between proactive
Blog 20 November, 2025 5 Ways Proactive AI Can Reduce Manual Workload in Contact Centres Contact centres today face a familiar challenge: maintaining exceptional service while managing high volumes, rising costs, and limited resources. Agents are spending valuable time on repetitive, manual work instead of focusing on complex, high-value interactions that truly build customer loyalty. This is where Proactive AI makes a measurable difference. By combining automation with intelligence, it